Runtime ownership
Ask where the control plane and agent services run, who operates the host, and whether the supported topology matches the proposed customer environment.
Platform comparison
Compare operational evidence, not on-premise labels
Two vendors can both say on-premise while offering very different control. Compare the exact runtime boundary, tenant isolation, external dependencies, secrets and storage ownership, operating evidence, update mechanism, and recovery path. Require each answer to point to documentation, configuration, a test, or a production record.
Comparison graphic
Use one evidence model across every vendor
Score each platform against the same operating boundaries. Mark unavailable evidence as unavailable rather than interpreting it as a supported capability.
Evidence-first platform review
Every claim needs an owner, control, proof, and failure path.
Comparable deployment record
- Runtime and infrastructure ownership
- Tenant identity and isolation
- Model and network dependencies
- Secrets, state, logs, and metrics
- Updates, backup, and recovery
Isolation mechanism
Look for concrete identities, processes, filesystem boundaries, state separation, access controls, and shutdown or revocation behavior.
Model boundary
Separate agent-runtime hosting from model hosting. Record required egress, supported providers, fallback behavior, and whether customer-hosted models are production-supported or only possible.
Data ownership
Trace databases, workspaces, browser state, logs, shared storage, secrets, retention, deletion, and operator access across the full lifecycle.
Operational maturity
Require health checks, logs, redacted metrics, versioned updates, reconciliation, backup choices, recovery tests, and named operational ownership.
Claim discipline
Keep shipped, validated, experimental, and planned capabilities separate. A vendor-controlled on-prem deployment is not automatically proof of deployment inside a customer environment.
Bewize evidence boundary
These pages state what is supported today and where validation is still required.
Run an evidence-based platform review
Use your preferred comparison format or the Bewize deployment checklist. We will separate shipped capabilities, environment-specific validation, and unsupported assumptions.
Architecture conversation
Tell us what your team needs to control
Share your deployment boundary, number of agents, work surfaces, and governance requirements. We will reply by email to arrange a focused technical discussion.
Email the Bewize teamThis opens your email application. Read our Privacy Policy.